Does legislation reduce harm to doctors who prescribe for themselves?

نویسندگان

  • Margaret Kay
  • Chris B Del Mar
  • Geoffrey Mitchell
چکیده

OBJECTIVE To consider the issue of legislation restricting self prescribing by doctors. METHOD Searches of the medical literature in Medline, Australian Medical Index and CINAHL using the terms 'medical', 'legislation' and 'physician impairment' from 1966-2003 supplemented by checking citations of review papers. RESULTS We found 144 articles, although no trials of legislation. The remaining research was inadequate to answer the question of whether restricting self prescribing reduces doctor impairment. However, descriptive studies suggest that impairment attributed to self prescribing is most often from self administration, which is not altered by legislation to restrict self prescribing. DISCUSSION There are important theoretical adverse consequences of legislation that restrict self prescribing. Apparently self evident legislation may be counter productive. The need for doctors to have an independent general practitioner is reinforced.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

مبانی نظری (اخلاقی، فلسفی و فقهی) امتناع از درمان

Patient's refusal of treatment is the rational consequence of informed consent and is considered among the patient's rights but can lead to patient harm or harm to others, or damage to the health care system. Major ethical challenges in the field of treatment refusal arise from capacitated patients. This paper mainly examines theoretical issues related to this group by reviewing books on jurisp...

متن کامل

Margaret McCartney: Blaming doctors won't reduce antibiotic overuse.

“Doctors write 10 million needless antibiotic prescriptions a year,” was the Guardian’s headline, and Mark Baker, director of clinical practice at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), told the BBC that some doctors are a “soft touch” and that “ultimately, if they fail to fall into line, there is always recourse to the professional regulator.” Furthermore, NICE said, “If...

متن کامل

Active drug users as social change agents: some ethical dimensions.

Active drug users—whom I here roughly categorize as habituated, addicted, or dependent (HAD) users who are not currently inclined to abandon their use of such drugs1—may desire individually or collectively to assert themselves in the wider social world of work and social policy. Drug-dependent individuals may seek work in harm reduction centers or as custodians, accountants, or doctors. Activis...

متن کامل

The pitfalls of prescribing for family and friends.

In most of Australia there is no legislation prohibiting medical practitioners from prescribing for family and friends. In South Australia it is prohibited to prescribe Schedule 8 drugs for family members unless it is a verifiable emergency. The Medical Board of Australia states medical practitioners should avoid providing medical care to anyone with whom they have a close personal relationship...

متن کامل

Would judicial consent for assisted dying protect vulnerable people?

In The BMJ this week, two experts discuss whether the Assisted Dying Bill, to be debated at the House of Commons next month, would provide adequate protection for vulnerable people from harm. The new Bill, presented by Mr Rob Marris MP, proposes legislation that would allow doctors to help terminally ill and mentally competent adults to die by prescribing drugs that patients would administer th...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Australian family physician

دوره 34 1-2  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005